Shields – Rounds, Heaters & Bucklers


Different Shields for Different Tasks

Hello military history enthusiasts,

I hope you had a good start into the new year.

Today’s newsletter is all about various forms of medieval shields: why different shapes were developed in the first place, and how they held up in combat.

I hope you will find it interesting and useful – and may you not need a shield in 2023, except for enjoyable purposes and recreation.


Round Shields, Domed and Flat

At all times, military equipment was designed to meet the requirements of the specific combat contexts fighters had to deal with. Shields are no exception in this regard. Their various forms reflect the kind of fighting a given military was trained for. For example, Frankish armies favoured domed round shields which, due to their excellent deflective qualities were perfectly suited for fighting from horseback and in large formations.

In contrast, contemporary Viking war bands preferred the flat round shield which, in close combat, could be used as a weapon in its own right, e.g. to lever open or pin an opposing shield with the edge – a quality that can be played out in single combat, small scale skirmish and hit-and-run attacks. These are exactly the kind of combat contexts the highly mobile Scandinavian raiders excelled in, while generally avoiding large scale battles against Frankish and Anglo-Saxon forces.


Light weight, yet durable?

Modern audiences and museum visitors are often surprised by the delicacy of historical shield boards. The thickness of the laminated construction consisting of a wooden core and layers of animal hide, sometimes reinforced with sinew, hardly ever exceeds 10 mm, with the edge often trimmed down to half this thickness.

Considering that, according to historical depictions, pretty much all medieval shields were used offensively at times, a light weight construction makes sense (here is a free article on fighting with kite shields, for instance). A heavy, cumbersome shield that tires out your arm too quickly is apparently not a good choice. However, this begs the question, how durable and resistant historical shields actually were. After all, a lot of effort went into their making (just take a look at this interesting article).

Historical shield repairs and damages have occasionally been recorded by archaeology. Small sheet metal patches on Germanic Iron Age shields from Illerup Ådal, and superficial cuts on the 12th century kite shield from Szczecin (see more photos here) suggest that careful distance management was just as important in shield fighting as in combat without shields.

However, what happened when missiles were fired, or when ranks broke, and your shield was the last line of defence? Members of the Finnish living history group Hirdmenn have once again run according tests with carefully reconstructed flat Viking Age shields, and they have kindly compiled the respective videos in a playlist. You can find additional info (e.g. on how easy it was to repair shields after the tests) in their blog post. The test results will be published in an academic format by archaeologist Sakari Saaristo (on the left in the above photo) in due course.


Fighting with Heater Shields

And while we are at it, here are some training fights with high and late medieval heater shields, recorded at the Berlin Buckler Bouts in November 2022. Despite being busy with working on our up-coming sword & buckler online course, Cornelius Berthold found the time to edit a video for you.


New Buckler Book

Finally, I would like to bring to your attention a brand new publication on historical bucklers. Building up on his Book of the Buckler, swordsman and researcher Herbert Schmidt presents ‘The Medieval and Renaissance Buckler’ with a contribution by Danish archaeologist and shield expert Rolf Warming.


I hope you found this newsletter interesting. If you enjoyed it, tell your friends about it. They can sign up here. Thank you for your time and your interest.

Yours,

Roland


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for it, or because you have previously expressed your interest in my work and events. If you prefer to not receive further emails, you can unsubscribe below.


Dimicator

I’m Roland Warzecha — professional illustrator and swordsman. The name Dimicator comes from the Latin for “sword fighter.” I share cutting-edge research into historical martial arts, focusing in particular on Viking and high medieval sword-and-shield combat. My work is carried out in collaboration with museums, fellow martial artists, and scholars around the world.

Read more from Dimicator

Continuity in European Combat Arts? Hello fellow sword enthusiasts, researchers, and fighters, How did people actually fight in close combat 3,000 years ago—and how much of that knowledge survived into the age of the fechtbücher? Mycenaean imagery occassionally shows an overhand thrust known as oberstich in late medieval German combat treatises Recently, a viewer asked why I do not demonstrate the use of Bronze Age swords with what he called a “hammer grip” — essentially gripping the weapon...

Studying Originals, Recreating History Holding an original Bronze Age sword in your hands is always a moment of quiet astonishment. Hello archaeology aficionados, The ingenious design and ergonomics of these weapons never cease to amaze me. Thanks to the courtesy of Professor Harald Meller and Dr Jan-Heinrich Bunnefeld, I had the opportunity to examine several bronze swords at the State Museum of Prehistory in Halle, home of the world-famous Nebra Sky Disc. One of the grips that works really...

Hello fellow bucklerista, You are most welcome to sign up for an action-packed weekend of sword & buckler fencing with practitioners from all over the world. The next BBB are scheduled for the weekend of 30/31 May 2026. Find info on the event and registration here: Go to Event Post We are looking forward to fencing and celebrating international friendship with you at the Berlin Buckler Bouts. Ralf, Roland & the Twerchhau team Attendees of the 24th BBB. Get the group photo here.